Home » Ross Kimbarovsky
Ross Kimbarovsky
Of Counsel
- 312.243.5900
- ross@loevy.com
Biography
Over a career spanning three decades, Ross Kimbarovsky has tried and won jury and bench trials, argued appeals, and both prosecuted and defended class actions in technology, intellectual property, and complex commercial disputes—matters with exposure ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of dollars. He now represents creators and consumers in some of the most consequential generative-AI and biometric-privacy cases in the country.
Ross serves as lead trial counsel for independent musicians in nationwide class actions against the generative AI music companies Suno and Udio, and against Google and Kunlun Tech/Skywork AI, alleging that these companies copied vast libraries of copyrighted sound recordings to train and operate competing music products, stripping copyright-management information in the process. Those cases assert claims for copyright infringement, DMCA violations, false endorsement, the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), the Illinois Right of Publicity Act, and related state-law claims.
In May 2026, Ross brought nine class actions at once against Adobe, Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Apple, ElevenLabs, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Samsung—among the largest companies in the world—on behalf of nationally recognized broadcast journalists, podcasters, audiobook narrators, and voice actors. The suits allege that these companies captured the plaintiffs’ voiceprints, stored them, and fed them into AI training pipelines without the written notice, consent, or retention policies BIPA requires, building a multibillion-dollar voice-AI industry on the voices of real people and then using that technology to compete with the very people whose voices trained it. Biometric identifiers are unlike any other personal data: a Social Security number can be changed and a password reset, but once a voiceprint or faceprint is taken, it cannot be undone.
Ross began his legal career in 1995 at Hopkins & Sutter, litigating complex commercial and intellectual property disputes in state and federal courts and contested regulatory proceedings before the Illinois Commerce Commission. He later became a partner at Ungaretti & Harris LLP, where he chaired the firm’s Intellectual Property group. His trial work from those years spanned patent, trade-secret, software, and computer-intrusion cases, including DMCA claims he litigated on appeal to the Federal Circuit. It also ranged from a full defense verdict, after a bench trial, on all causes of action, in a nationally certified class action seeking more than $125 million, to a $4.6 billion administrative trial in which he helped defend a major airport improvement project at Miami International Airport against a challenge by six major airlines.
In 2007, Ross left large-firm practice to build and lead technology companies. He founded and ran a venture that served hundreds of thousands of businesses worldwide, and from 2014 to 2017 he founded a second startup, where he led multiple teams building AI products, in the years before the transformer architecture that underlies today’s generative-AI systems was introduced. That experience shapes how he litigates against technology defendants now: having built AI products, managed user data, and run technology companies from the inside, he understands not only what these companies did, but how and why they did it.
Ross has been recognized as an Illinois Super Lawyer and named one of “40 Illinois Attorneys Under Forty To Watch.” He received his J.D. from the University of Illinois College of Law in 1995 and his B.A. from Northwestern University in 1992
BAR ADMISSIONS
- Illinois Supreme Court
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
- U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Education + Honors
University of Illinois College of Law
- J.D. 1995
Northwestern University
- B.A. 1992 (Political Science and Philosophy)
Representative Cases
Generative AI, Biometric Privacy, and the Right of Publicity
- Marin v. Alphabet/Google, No. 26-cv-05436 (N.D. Ill.)
- Amer v. ElevenLabs, No. 26-cv-05437 (N.D. Ill.)
- Marin v. Meta, No. 26-cv-05438 (N.D. Ill.)
- Rogers v. NVIDIA, No. 26-cv-05478 (N.D. Ill.)
- Flowers v. Microsoft, No. 26-cv-05491 (N.D. Ill.)
- Rogers v. Amazon, No. 26-cv-05497 (N.D. Ill.)
- Lacour v. Apple, No. 26-cv-05536 (N.D. Ill.)
- Nassif v. Samsung, No. 26-cv-05567 (N.D. Ill.)
- Dorcus v. Adobe, No. 26-cv-05575 (N.D. Ill.)
Nine class actions filed on behalf of Illinois journalists, podcasters, audiobook narrators, and voice actors, alleging that the world’s largest technology companies harvested and used their voiceprints to train and operate AI voice products in violation of BIPA.
- Google generative AI music class action (N.D. Ill.). Lead trial counsel for independent musicians in a putative nationwide class action against Google, alleging it copied millions of copyrighted recordings, compositions, and lyrics, including from its own platform, to train and operate Lyria and related generative-music products, asserting copyright, DMCA, Lanham Act, BIPA, right-of-publicity, and state-law claims.
- Suno generative AI music class action (N.D. Ill.). Lead trial counsel for independent musicians alleging that Suno used copyrighted sound recordings without permission to train and operate its models and generate competing music.
- Udio generative AI music class action (N.D. Ill.). Lead trial counsel for independent musicians challenging Udio’s use of copyrighted sound recordings to build and run its AI music system.
- Kunlun Tech / Skywork AI generative AI music class action (N.D. Ill.). Lead trial counsel for independent musicians in a putative nationwide class action against a global conglomerate over its Mureka generative-music service.
Class Actions and Consumer Protection
- Wolf v. Accredo (N.D. Ill.) — Counsel for a putative class alleging that The Cigna Group, Evernorth, and Express Scripts used their PBM market power to foreclose competing specialty pharmacies.
- Casey v. QT (Cir. Ct. Cook Cty.) — Trial counsel in a nationally certified class action seeking more than $125 million; obtained a full defense verdict on all causes of action after a lengthy bench trial.
- FTC v. QT, Inc. (N.D. Ill.) — Trial counsel in a Federal Trade Commission Act enforcement action concerning consumer-product advertising.
Technology, Intellectual Property, and Trade Secrets
- Macrovision Corp. v. Sima Products Corp. (S.D.N.Y.; Fed. Cir.) — Trial and appellate counsel in a video/DVD technology dispute involving patent infringement and DMCA anti-circumvention claims; secured a favorable settlement after litigating the DMCA issues on appeal.
- Katris v. Ernst & Co. (N.D. Ill.; Cir. Ct. Cook Cty.) — Trial counsel in a financial-trading-software misappropriation case; obtained dismissal of all claims on summary judgment, affirmed on appeal.
- SunGard Data Systems v. WTD, Ltd. (N.D. Ill.) — Trial counsel in a computer-intrusion and trade-secrets case against former employees; favorable settlement after expedited discovery.
Complex Commercial and Regulatory Disputes
- Air Canada v. Department of Transportation (DOT) — Counsel for Miami-Dade County in a $4.6 billion administrative trial brought by six major airlines challenging a major improvement project at Miami International Airport; successfully defended the project.
- Emerald Casino litigation (Ill. state, bankruptcy, and administrative proceedings) — Trial counsel to an Illinois casino licensee in proceedings involving its gaming license.
- K&M Plastics et al. v. Commonwealth Edison Co. (Illinois Commerce Commission) — Trial counsel in an administrative trial over electric utility rates for large commercial customers; settled after a favorable trial verdict.
Our Impact
Loevy + Loevy has won more multi-million dollar verdicts than perhaps any other law firm in the country over the past decade. Our willingness to take hard cases to trial, and win them, has yielded a nationally recognized reputation for success in the courtroom.
Read the latest public reporting and press releases about Loevy + Loevy’s clients, our public interest litigation, and our civil rights impact.
We take on the nation’s most difficult public interest cases, advocating in and outside the courtroom to secure justice for our clients and to hold officials, governments, and corporations accountable.